@FA
This, IMHO is pure FUD.
No, it's more likely the perspective of a person who has thoughtfully observed a number of technology hype cycles come and go. You just don't have to wait that long until you find some startup show up and push yet another "next big thing" which is held up as solving everyone's problem, only to find that it, too, has its own set of weaknesses that set it up to be the victim of the next hype cycle. In the best case scenario, everyone's just re-inventing things that worked well in past decades ("NoSQL databases are everywhere these days; we sure could use a standard way to extract, transform, and load data for all of them!). Worst case is that the replacements keep getting worse and worse until industries (and possibly entire societies) collapse. I can easily argue that we're closer to seeing the latter . . .
Please show me one scripted language that has the equivalents of numpy, scipy, and lots of other scientific libraries.
Cherry picking. The same arguments were long made in favor of Perl by referencing CPAN. I worked in a place a few years ago where everyone was R-happy because there were certain necessary statistical libraries available. The fundamental truth is that, from a computer science perspective, you must step back and assess what the various pieces (OS, libraries, languages, etc.) bring to a project and what they cost.
That cost factor is why (steering things back around to security) you still often see systems not being updated to use newer encryption or hash algorithms. Software architects too often make the mistake of over-specifying solutions, to the point where the implementation is a mess of brittle co-dependencies that can't be touched if you want it to keep working (leading to the containerization fad).
It's just superior in all ways.
Nobody with a depth of experience in a wide variety of technologies would ever come to that conclusion. Everything has trade-offs. Any proper scientific analysis contains experiments that can falsify the hypothesis. If you're sure you've found a silver bullet, odd are you haven't even read "The Mythical Man-Month".
2a8334c2a9d9b141e202c5450fa7494498fdf17c8ff21ff1711588862d68cea2