> But won’t give a pass to Google, Apple or Linux devs either. Straw man. I didn't give anyone a pass, I just called out MS for their history and questionable presence as part of this task force. Same with Amazon. My server logs show so many attacks coming from their IP space that it is laughable that anyone would turn to them for consultation on what to do about abuse. The DoJ should not be sleeping with the enemy. > We are seeing an upwared shift in trend when it comes to exploiting MacOS No, we are not. No system is 100% secure, and the Mac is no exception. But it *is* still so secure that somehow people will conflate the story of a mere vulnerability to trojans with things like the widespread Exchange exploit. They're not the same; they're not even in the same ballpark. Anyone who says otherwise should not be employed in the security field. > What is your criteria for “most damaging exploits”? Pwnable out of the box remotely, of course. Microsoft *dominates* that space. > So when you get told “market share” for Windows is why there are so many exploits… Again, nobody worth listening to will try to tell you that. There are so many bad Windows vulnerabilities because it is inherently insecure, full stop. If such a system is put into service in a manner that makes a subsequent *exploit* of those vulnerabilities valuable, that is a poor security decision and should result in IT management and staff being either retrained or retired. ad14e2ce6845c3074c7e3527a2a899efa41a833819e1df4c002b136dc16f108c